Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS 1.2L CVT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS 1.2L CVT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS 1.2L CVT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱867,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/5-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4245 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1670 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1515 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 905 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring w/ Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15x5.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15x5.0 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS 1.2L CVT (2015): which should you buy?
For those looking for a practical and affordable option with good fuel economy, the Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS is recommended. It offers better power output, more doors, and a higher seating capacity while being slightly cheaper. The Ford Ecosport, on the other hand, provides a more versatile setup but at a premium price point.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS has 78 PS of power compared to the Ford Ecosport's 110 PS.
Which car offers better fuel efficiency?
The Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS operates with a CVT transmission, which generally provides better fuel efficiency than an A/T system found in the Ford Ecosport.
Is one vehicle more suitable for daily commuting than the other?
Both vehicles are practical for daily use. However, the Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS has 2+3 seating capacity and is FWD, which might be slightly better suited for daily commuters compared to the RWD setup of the Ford Ecosport.
Which car offers more doors?
The Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS comes with 4 doors while the Ford Ecosport has 5. This makes the Mirage G4 GLS a bit more versatile in terms of passenger configuration.