Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Sylphy 1.6L CVT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Sylphy 1.6L CVT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Nissan Sylphy 1.6L CVT (2015) Nissan ₱993,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1598cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 116 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | XTRONIC CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4615 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1495 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2700 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1215 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electric Power Steering (Speed Sensing) |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Centralized |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Full Auto-Climate w/ Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Premium Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Remote Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Sylphy 1.6L CVT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical hatchback with a good balance of performance and fuel efficiency, the Ford Ecosport is recommended. With its naturally aspirated inline-4 engine producing 110 PS at 6300 rpm and 142 Nm at 4500 rpm, it offers decent power for city driving and highways. The Ford's RWD setup ensures better handling in wet conditions compared to the Nissan Sylphy's FWD layout. Despite its slightly higher price of ₱958,000, the Ecosport’s warranty coverage and availability make it a safer choice. For those prioritizing practicality over power or price, the Ford Ecosport is the better option.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle should I choose if I prioritize fuel efficiency over raw power?
The Nissan Sylphy offers more torque at 154 Nm compared to the Ford's 142 Nm, which can be beneficial for city driving and highway cruising. However, the Ecosport’s naturally aspirated engine is still a reliable choice with good fuel economy.
Is one of these vehicles better suited for daily commuting?
The Nissan Sylphy might be slightly more suitable for daily commuting due to its front-wheel drive layout which can offer smoother handling and better stability in wet conditions. However, the Ford Ecosport’s RWD setup ensures better grip on wet roads.
Which vehicle is cheaper between these two?
The Ford Ecosport is cheaper with a price tag of ₱958,000 compared to the Nissan Sylphy at ₱993,000. However, both vehicles offer similar power and practicality.
Which vehicle has better warranty coverage?
Both vehicles come with the same warranty of 100,000km/3-years, so in terms of warranty, they are equally covered.