Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Sylphy 1.6L MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Sylphy 1.6L MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Nissan Sylphy 1.6L MT (2015) Nissan ₱908,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1598cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 116 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4615 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1495 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2700 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1190 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electric Power Steering (Speed Sensing) |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Centralized |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Remote Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Sylphy 1.6L MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a reliable and fuel-efficient hatchback with good power-to-weight ratio, the Ford Ecosport is recommended. It offers better power output at 110 PS compared to the Nissan Sylphy's 116 PS, making it potentially more suited for spirited driving or towing light loads. The FWD setup of the Sylphy might be a drawback for buyers looking for a car that excels in daily commuting due to its higher center of gravity and reduced stability. Both cars have similar power-to-weight ratios but the Ecosport's 1498cc inline-4 engine is more powerful, which could translate into better performance on highways or when towing.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Ford Ecosport and Nissan Sylphy?
The Ford Ecosport is slightly cheaper at ₱958,000 compared to the Nissan Sylphy at ₱908,000.
Which car has better power output?
The Ford Ecosport outperforms the Nissan Sylphy with 110 PS versus 116 PS respectively.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Nissan Sylphy might be a better choice for daily commuting due to its FWD setup, which generally offers better stability and handling compared to RWD hatchbacks like the Ecosport.
Which car has a higher maximum torque?
The Ford Ecosport has a higher maximum torque of 142 Nm compared to the Nissan Sylphy's 154 Nm, which could be beneficial for towing or spirited driving.