Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Almera 1.5L V AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Almera 1.5L V AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Nissan Almera 1.5L V AT (2016) Nissan ₱900,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Natuarlly Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 134 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4425 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2600 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1077 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 41 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Springs & Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Rigid Axle, Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electric Power Steering (Speed Sensing) |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Full Auto Climate w/ Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Almera 1.5L V AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact SUV with decent power and practicality, the Ford Ecosport stands out as the better choice. It offers more torque and slightly higher max power than the Nissan Almera, making it suitable for daily commuting and handling urban conditions better. The FWD setup of the Almera is less suited for heavy traffic and may not handle rough roads as well as a RWD vehicle like the Ecosport.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has more torque?
The Ford Ecosport has 142 Nm of max torque at 4500 rpm, while the Nissan Almera has 134 Nm of max torque at 4000 rpm.
Is one car cheaper than the other?
Yes, the Nissan Almera is cheaper with a price tag of ₱900,000 compared to the Ford Ecosport's ₱958,000.
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The data provided does not specify fuel efficiency for either vehicle. However, considering power and torque, the Ecosport might offer a slight advantage in urban driving conditions due to its higher torque output at lower RPMs.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting?
The Ford Ecosport is better suited for daily commuting as it offers more torque and slightly higher max power compared to the Nissan Almera, making it easier to handle heavy traffic and urban conditions.