Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Juke 1.6L Upper CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Juke 1.6L Upper CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Nissan Juke 1.6L Upper CVT (2016) Nissan ₱1,021,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1598cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve Twin CVTC |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 116 PS @ 5600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | XTRONIC CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4135 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1580 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2520 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1332 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 52 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | Independent MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam Axle |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 215/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 215/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electric Power Steering (Speed Sensing) |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Full Autoclimate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Intelligent Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Projector/Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Nissan Juke 1.6L Upper CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an entry-level SUV or compact crossover with good fuel economy and practicality, the Ford Ecosport is the better choice. It offers more power, better transmission options, and more features compared to the Nissan Juke. The Ecosport's 1498cc engine produces 110PS at 6300rpm while the Juke's 1598cc engine pushes out 116PS at 5600rpm. Both have a similar price range but the Ford has more doors and seating capacity, making it better for families or groups of friends.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Ford Ecosport and Nissan Juke?
The Ford Ecosport starts at ₱958,000 while the Nissan Juke begins at ₱1,021,000. The Ecosport is cheaper by ₱63,000.
Which vehicle has better power output?
The Ford Ecosport outperforms the Nissan Juke with 110PS compared to 116PS for the Juke at their respective RPMs.
Which car is more suitable for daily commuting?
Both cars have a similar transmission type, but the Ford Ecosport's naturally aspirated engine and better fuel economy make it slightly more practical for daily use.
What are the differences in seating capacity between the two vehicles?
The Ford Ecosport offers 2+3 seating capacity while the Nissan Juke has a similar layout of 2+3 seats, but the Ecosport can accommodate more passengers due to its additional doors.