Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) and the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) depends on your priorities. The Ecosport is more powerful with 110 PS and 142 Nm torque, and it has a 6-speed A/T, but it's more expensive at ₱958,000 and seats only 5. It's a hatchback with RWD and body-on-frame construction, which may offer better off-road capability but less interior space. The Ertiga is cheaper at ₱865,000, seats 7 (2+2+3), and has a unibody construction with FWD, making it more practical for families and daily commuting. However, it has a smaller 1.4L engine producing 96 PS and 130 Nm with a 4-speed AT. If you prioritize power and a sportier drive, choose the Ecosport. If you need more seats, better fuel efficiency, and lower price, choose the Ertiga. Both have the same warranty and similar length, but the Ertiga offers better value for family use.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) is cheaper at ₱865,000 compared to the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) at ₱958,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ecosport has a more powerful engine with 110 PS and 142 Nm torque, while the Suzuki Ertiga produces 96 PS and 130 Nm.
Which is better for a family?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for families as it seats 7 passengers (2+2+3) and has an MPV body style, while the Ecosport seats only 5.
Which has better transmission?
The Ford Ecosport has a more modern 6-speed A/T, while the Suzuki Ertiga uses a 4-speed AT, which may be less efficient.