Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GLX (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GLX (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GLX (2016) Suzuki ₱965,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GLX (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a practical hatchback with decent power and reasonable fuel efficiency, the Ford Ecosport is recommended. It offers better engine performance and more doors compared to the Suzuki Ertiga. The Ecosport's 1498cc inline-4 naturally aspirated engine produces 110 PS at 6300 rpm and 142 Nm of torque at 4500 rpm, making it a better choice for daily commuting in urban areas. It also has more doors (5 vs 5) and a body-on-frame construction which is generally stronger than unibody designs. The Ertiga's engine is smaller at 1373cc with fuel injection, producing less power and torque compared to the Ford, making it less suitable for heavy daily use like urban driving.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Ford Ecosport and Suzuki Ertiga?
The Ford Ecosport is slightly cheaper at ₱958,000 compared to the Suzuki Ertiga at ₱965,000.
Which vehicle has better power output?
The Ford Ecosport has better power output with 110 PS and 142 Nm of torque compared to the Suzuki Ertiga's 96 PS and 130 Nm of torque.
Which car is more suitable for daily commuting in urban areas?
The Ford Ecosport is more suitable for daily commuting due to its better engine performance, more doors, and body-on-frame construction which provides a stronger structure.
Which vehicle has a longer wheelbase?
Both vehicles have the same length of 4265mm, but the Ford Ecosport's body-on-frame construction might provide better stability for urban driving compared to the Suzuki Ertiga's unibody design.