Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱868,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1716 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 215/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 215/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4x2 MT (2017) is the better choice if you need a workhorse for hauling and off-road capability, offering a turbo diesel engine with 285 Nm of torque and a pickup body. It's also cheaper at ₱868,000. However, the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) is more suitable for daily city driving and family use, with an automatic transmission, hatchback body, and slightly higher price at ₱958,000. The Ranger has a longer wheelbase and larger dimensions, making it less maneuverable in tight urban spaces. The Ecosport's naturally aspirated engine produces 110 PS, which is adequate for city commutes, while the Ranger's turbo diesel delivers strong low-end torque for carrying loads. Both have similar warranty coverage. Ultimately, choose the Ranger for utility and towing, and the Ecosport for comfort and ease of driving in the city.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4x2 MT (2017) is cheaper at ₱868,000 compared to the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) at ₱958,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has higher torque (285 Nm) and slightly more power (120 PS) than the Ecosport (142 Nm, 110 PS), making it more powerful for heavy loads.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ecosport is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, smaller size, and hatchback body, which are easier to drive and park in the city.
Which has a larger cargo capacity?
The Ford Ranger, being a pickup, has a larger cargo bed for hauling, while the Ecosport is a hatchback with limited trunk space.