Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T (2018) Mitsubishi ₱885,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 105 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4475 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1695 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15 alloy |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical compact crossover with good fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T is the better choice. It offers more power, better torque, and a smoother ride due to its unibody construction. The Ford Ecosport's naturally aspirated engine may struggle in traffic, but it's still a solid option for those who prioritize lower prices.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T is expected to have better fuel efficiency due to its smaller displacement and unibody construction compared to the Ford Ecosport.
What's the difference in power between the two vehicles?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T produces more power with 105 PS at 6000 rpm, while the Ford Ecosport has a slightly higher peak torque of 142 Nm but less max power of 110 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T offers more comfort and smoother ride due to its unibody construction, making it preferable for daily commuting.
What's the warranty coverage on each vehicle?
Both vehicles offer a similar warranty period of 3 years or 100,000 kilometers, but the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX M/T has an additional year compared to the Ford Ecosport Trend AT.