Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs MG 3 1.5 LUX CVT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs MG 3 1.5 LUX CVT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | MG 3 1.5 LUX CVT (2024) MG ₱898,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 120 PS |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 150 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4055 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1729 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1521 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2570 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Laser Blue, Moon White, Carbon Grey Metallic, Extreme Speed Red, Morning Gold, Meteorite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1190 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/55/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/55/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs MG 3 1.5 LUX CVT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical hatchback, the Ford Ecosport stands out with its lower price tag of ₱958,000 compared to the MG 3 at ₱898,888. The Ford offers better value as it comes with a warranty of 100,000km/3-years and is available in RWD for better traction on various terrains. The MG 3, while more powerful, lacks the robustness and reliability of the Ecosport. For daily commuting or basic road use, the Ford Ecosport provides excellent value with its practicality and lower costs.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Ford Ecosport and MG 3?
The Ford Ecosport is cheaper at ₱958,000 compared to the MG 3 priced at ₱898,888.
How much more powerful is the MG 3 compared to the Ford Ecosport?
The MG 3 has a slight edge with 120 PS vs. the Ford Ecosport's 110 PS.
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency and maintenance costs?
Both vehicles have similar power outputs but the Ford Ecosport benefits from its lower price tag, which can translate to potentially better overall value in terms of maintenance and fuel costs.
Is there a difference in the drivetrain between the two models?
Yes, the Ford Ecosport is available only with RWD (Rear Wheel Drive), while the MG 3 offers FWD (Front Wheel Drive).