Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT (2025) Mitsubishi ₱937,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 78 PS |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 100 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Family Sedan |
| Segment | J | Sedan |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4305 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1670 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1515 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2550 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Titanium Gray Metallic, Red Metallic, Cool Silver Metallic, White Solid |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 935 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | — |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | — |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | — |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | — |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | — |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | — |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | — |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | — |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | — |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | No | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | Yes | — |
| SD Card Slot | No | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a practical and fuel-efficient vehicle, the Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT seems to be the better choice. It offers a more powerful engine with 78 PS compared to Ford Ecosport's 110 PS, making it suitable for daily commuting without feeling sluggish. The lower price of ₱937,000 also makes it an attractive option for those on a budget. Additionally, the Mirage has FWD which is better suited for urban driving and less likely to slip in wet conditions compared to RWD.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Ford Ecosport and Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT?
The Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT is cheaper at ₱937,000 compared to the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT which costs ₱958,000.
Which vehicle has more power and why might that matter?
The Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT has more power with 78 PS compared to the Ford Ecosport's 110 PS. More power can mean better acceleration which is useful for daily commuting, especially in urban settings.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting and why?
The Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT is better suited for daily commuting due to its FWD configuration, making it more reliable for city driving compared to the RWD of the Ford Ecosport which can be less stable in wet conditions.
Which car has a longer warranty period and why might that matter?
Both vehicles offer warranties of 3 years or 100,000 km. However, Mitsubishi Mirage G4 GLS CVT's shorter warranty duration (3 years) is slightly less than Ford Ecosport's (3 years or 100,000 km).