Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) Ford ₱1,199,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 255/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026): which should you buy?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is the clear choice for the average Filipino commuter prioritizing fuel economy, front-wheel drive reliability, and lower upfront costs. At ₱1,099,000, it saves you ₱100,000 compared to the Ford Ranger XLS. While the Ford offers a rugged 4WD system and a turbocharged 2.2L diesel engine producing 150 PS, the Xpander's naturally aspirated 1.5L gasoline engine delivers 105 PS. If you need a versatile 5-door MPV for family transport with 2+3+2 seating, the Xpander wins on practicality and price. The Ford Ranger is only suitable if you strictly require a 4x4 pickup truck with higher torque (375 Nm) and a 2+3 seating layout, accepting the higher price and heavier weight.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is cheaper, priced at ₱1,099,000, which is ₱100,000 less than the Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4x4 MT priced at ₱1,199,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger XLS has the more powerful engine with 150 PS and 375 Nm of torque, whereas the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT has a 105 PS engine with 141 Nm of torque.
Which one is better for daily commuting in traffic?
For daily commuting, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is generally better due to its lighter weight, unibody construction, and naturally aspirated gasoline engine, which typically offers better fuel efficiency than the heavy, turbocharged diesel 4WD Ford Ranger.
Which vehicle has more seating capacity?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT offers more seating capacity with a 2+3+2 layout (5 doors), while the Ford Ranger XLS has a 2+3 seating layout (4 doors).