Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱671,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 975 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost against modest performance, the 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT is the more budget‑friendly choice at ₱671,000, roughly ₱170,000 cheaper than the 2016 Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT. Both cars share similar warranty terms (100,000 km/3 years) and front‑wheel‑drive layouts, but the Brio offers a slightly higher peak power (100 PS vs 99 PS) and torque (127 Nm vs 123 Nm), giving it a marginal edge in low‑rev pull. The Vios, however, comes as a four‑door sedan with a longer wheelbase (4410 mm) that may translate to more rear‑seat room and a traditional trunk, which some families prefer over the Brio’s hatchback hatch. Fuel‑economy figures favor the Brio slightly (19.32 km/L combined vs Vios’s unspecified combined figure, but city and highway numbers suggest the Brio is efficient). Transmission differences are notable: the Brio uses a 5‑speed automatic, while the Vios is equipped with a CVT, which generally offers smoother acceleration but can feel less engaging. If upfront price, slightly better power, and hatchback versatility are priorities, the Brio is the better pick. If you need a sedan’s extra cabin space and prefer CVT smoothness, the Vios justifies its higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 S AT costs ₱671,000, which is about ₱170,000 less than the 2016 Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT priced at ₱841,000.
Which car has more power?
The Brio produces 100 PS and 127 Nm of torque, while the Vios makes 99 PS and 123 Nm, giving the Brio a slight power advantage.
Is the Brio more fuel‑efficient?
The Brio’s combined fuel economy is 19.32 km/L (city 18.27, highway 20.37), which is the only explicit figure provided, indicating it is efficient for its class.
What are the practical differences for daily use?
The Brio is a hatchback with a 5‑speed automatic, offering a compact footprint and lower price; the Vios is a four‑door sedan with a longer length (4410 mm) and a CVT, providing more rear‑seat space and a smoother transmission feel.