Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 | Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) Isuzu ₱770,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 2499cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | SOHC 8-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 85 PS @ 3900 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 185 Nm @ 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 18.5 : 1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | Euro-2 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | AUV |
| Segment | A | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4480 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1680 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1765 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2680 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 935 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Torsion Bar Springs and Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Flex Ride MOVE Suspension, Semi-Elliptical Leaf Springs with Telescopic Shock Absorbers |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 14-inch Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 14-inch Steel |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/80/R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/80/R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual, Single |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Beige-color Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an affordable and practical hatchback with decent power, the Honda Brio seems to be the better choice. With its lower price tag of ₱631,000 compared to Isuzu Crosswind's ₱770,000, it offers more bang for the buck. The Honda also has a 5-speed manual transmission which can save fuel and is easier to drive than the Crosswind's Euro-2 emission diesel engine. If you prioritize power output, the Isuzu Crosswind with its turbocharged inline-four engine of 85 PS at 3900 rpm might be more suitable for those who need a bit more oomph in their daily driving.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Honda Brio and Isuzu Crosswind?
The Honda Brio is the cheaper option with a price tag of ₱631,000 compared to Isuzu Crosswind's ₱770,000.
Which vehicle has better power output?
The Isuzu Crosswind has better power output with 85 PS at 3900 rpm for its turbocharged engine versus Honda Brio's 100 PS @ 6000 rpm.
Is the Honda Brio more suitable for daily commuting compared to Isuzu Crosswind?
Yes, considering its lower price and manual transmission, the Honda Brio is better suited for daily commuting needs.
Which vehicle has a higher displacement?
The Isuzu Crosswind has a higher displacement of 2499cc compared to Honda Brio's 1339cc.