Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱791,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV |
| Segment | A | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 970 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
Between the Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) at ₱791,000 and the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) at ₱865,000, your choice hinges on priority: space vs. cost. The Brio is cheaper by ₱74,000, has a more powerful engine (100 PS vs 96 PS), and offers better fuel economy (combined 19.32 km/L vs no data for Ertiga). Its 5-speed AT is also one gear more than the Ertiga's 4-speed. However, the Ertiga is an MPV with 7 seats (2+2+3), making it far more practical for larger families or those who frequently carry passengers. The Brio is a 5-seat hatchback, better for singles, couples, or small families prioritizing fuel savings and maneuverability. If you need maximum passenger capacity and have a higher budget, choose the Ertiga. If you want lower upfront cost, better power, and likely lower running costs, choose the Brio.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Honda Brio and Suzuki Ertiga?
The Honda Brio is cheaper at ₱791,000, while the Suzuki Ertiga costs ₱865,000, a difference of ₱74,000.
Which has more power?
The Honda Brio has 100 PS, higher than the Suzuki Ertiga's 96 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Brio, with better fuel economy (combined 19.32 km/L) and a smaller footprint, is more efficient for city driving.
Which vehicle is better for a large family?
The Suzuki Ertiga, with its 7-seat MPV layout, offers far more passenger space than the 5-seat Honda Brio.