Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015) Honda ₱913,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1496cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 6,600 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 145Nm @ 4,800rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 20.99 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 31.03 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26.01 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV |
| Segment | B | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4440 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2600 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1107 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | H-Shaped Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.0 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.0 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Type with Touch Panel Controls | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Multi-Reflector Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical and reliable daily commuter, the 2015 Honda City 1.5 VX CVT is the better choice. It offers a higher power output of 120 PS compared to Suzuki’s 96 PS, and its fuel economy is superior with 20.99 km/L in city and 31.03 km/L on the highway, giving a combined average of 26.01 km/L versus Suzuki’s unspecified figures. The City’s CVT transmission delivers smoother acceleration and better fuel efficiency, while the Honda’s 100 000‑km/3‑year warranty matches Suzuki’s but the City’s discontinued status may affect parts availability. On the other hand, if a buyer prioritizes interior space and seating flexibility for family or group travel, the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GL AT is more suitable. It seats up to eight with a 2+2+3 layout, has a longer body length of 4265 mm, and is available as an MPV with a 4‑speed AT that may be easier to maintain. However, its smaller engine displacement (1373 cc) and lower torque (130 Nm) mean it will be less powerful and potentially less efficient. Therefore, choose the Honda City for daily commuting, fuel savings, and performance; choose the Suzuki Ertiga if you need more seating capacity and a larger vehicle for group travel.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT costs ₱865,000 while the Honda City 1.5 VX CVT is priced at ₱913,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Honda City 1.5 VX CVT delivers 120 PS, whereas the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT provides 96 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda City offers higher fuel economy (20.99 km/L city, 31.03 km/L highway) and a CVT transmission that is ideal for city driving.
Which vehicle offers more seating capacity?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT seats 8 people in a 2+2+3 configuration, while the Honda City’s seating capacity is not specified but it is a standard sedan.