Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) Honda ₱1,373,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 153 PS @ 6500 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 190 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 2WD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4582 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1820 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1469 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot Brake | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Reflector Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers prioritizing practicality and everyday usability. At ₱1,373,000, it is priced higher than the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) at ₱1,328,000, but it offers a naturally aspirated 1997cc engine with a 5-speed automatic transmission, which is more convenient for city driving. The CR-V has a 2WD drivetrain, making it easier to maneuver in Philippine traffic, while the Ranger is an RWD pick-up with a 6-speed manual transmission suited for heavier loads. Both vehicles come with a 100,000km/3-year warranty, but the CR-V’s smoother ride and broader utility make it ideal for daily commuting and family use. The Ranger’s turbocharged 2198cc engine delivers more power (160 PS vs. 153 PS), but its manual transmission and off-road orientation limit practicality for most urban drivers. Buy the CR-V if you need reliability and comfort; opt for the Ranger if you require heavy-duty capability and are willing to trade in convenience for power.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) costs ₱1,328,000, while the Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) costs ₱1,373,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) produces 160 PS, compared to 153 PS for the Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) is better for daily commuting due to its 5-speed automatic transmission and 2WD drivetrain, which are more convenient in city traffic.
What transmission does the Ranger use?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) uses a 6-speed manual transmission.