Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,778,000 Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2026
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 3 years or 100,000 kms
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2499cc 1499cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Variable Geometry Turbo Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Max Power 136 PS @ 3400 rpm 163 PS
Max Torque 320 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm 250 Nm
Transmission 5-Speed A/T CVT
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Midsize Crossover SUV
Segment J MPV
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 2+3+2
Length (mm) 4825 4680
Width (mm) 1860 1840
Height (mm) 1840 1780
Wheelbase (mm) 2845 2815
Construction Unibody
Exterior Colors Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic
Curb Weight (kg) 1500
Fuel Tank (L) 45
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer Torsion beam w/Coil Spring
Front Wheels 17 18
Rear Wheels 17 18
Front Tires 255/65/R17 225/55R18
Rear Tires 255/65/R17 225/55R18
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Disc
Steering Type hydraulic EPS
Steering Column tilt Tilt & Telescope
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No Yes
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Dual Zone Climate Control Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Leatherette
Parking Brake Manual EPB
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes Yes
Remote Trunk Release No Yes
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes no
Infotainment & Audio
Touchscreen No Yes
Navigation No No
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No Yes
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Speakers 8
Lighting
Headlights HID + Foglamps LED
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2015 Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4x4 AT and the 2026 Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT hinges on priorities. The mu-X is a discontinued, older diesel SUV with a 2.5L engine producing 136 PS and 320 Nm torque, paired with a 5-speed automatic and RWD. It seats 7 (2+3+2) and is priced at ₱1,778,000. In contrast, the Destinator is a current model, gasoline-powered midsize crossover with a 1.5L turbo engine (163 PS, 250 Nm), CVT, and FWD. It also seats 7 and costs ₱1,929,000. The mu-X offers higher torque for off-road or heavy load use, but the Destinator is more powerful (163 vs 136 PS), more modern, and likely more fuel-efficient for daily commuting. The Destinator's unibody construction suggests better on-road comfort. If you need a rugged, torque-rich SUV for towing or rough terrain, the mu-X is the choice—but it's discontinued, so availability is limited. For daily driving, modern features, and better power, the Destinator is superior despite the higher price. The mu-X's diesel may offer better fuel economy for long drives, but the Destinator's gasoline engine is quieter and smoother for city use. Ultimately, the Destinator is the better all-rounder for most families.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper?

The 2015 Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,778,000 compared to the 2026 Mitsubishi Destinator at ₱1,929,000.

Which is more powerful?

The Mitsubishi Destinator has more power with 163 PS versus the Isuzu mu-X's 136 PS.

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Mitsubishi Destinator is better for daily commuting due to its modern gasoline engine, CVT, and unibody construction, offering smoother and quieter city driving.

Which has more torque for towing or off-road?

The Isuzu mu-X has higher torque at 320 Nm compared to the Destinator's 250 Nm, making it better for towing or off-road use.