Lexus CT 200 (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Lexus CT 200 (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Lexus CT 200 (2015) Lexus ₱2,448,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) Nissan ₱2,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 + Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1798cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electr | Diesel |
| Max Power | 99 PS @ 5200 rpm (Engine) / 82 PS (Motor) | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4000 rpm (Engine) / 207 Nm (Motor) | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Segment | C | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4350 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1455 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2600 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1410 | 2255 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 205/55 R16 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/55 R16 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Lexus CT 200 (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Lexus CT 200 (2015) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2018) hinges on purpose and budget. The Lexus CT 200 is a discontinued hybrid hatchback priced at ₱2,448,000, offering a combined 181 PS (99 PS engine + 82 PS motor) and CVT for smooth, fuel-efficient city driving. It seats 5 and is ideal for individuals seeking a premium, eco-friendly car with hatchback practicality. However, it lacks modern features and is no longer available new. In contrast, the Nissan NV350 Urvan is a current model diesel van at ₱2,165,000, making it ₱283,000 cheaper. It packs a turbocharged 2.5L engine delivering 129 PS and a massive 356 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed automatic and RWD. Its body-on-frame construction suits heavy-duty use, passenger transport, or commercial purposes. The Nissan offers more low-end grunt and durability, plus a choice of six exterior colors. For daily commuting, the Lexus's hybrid system provides better fuel economy and a quieter ride. But for carrying people or cargo, the NV350's space, torque, and lower price make it the practical choice. Ultimately, the Lexus is for the eco-conscious luxury buyer, while the Nissan is for those needing a robust, versatile van.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Lexus CT 200 or the Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱2,165,000, while the Lexus CT 200 costs ₱2,448,000, a difference of ₱283,000.
Which vehicle has more engine power and torque?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque. The Lexus CT 200's combustion engine outputs 99 PS and 142 Nm, with an additional 82 PS and 207 Nm from its electric motor, but combined figures are not specified. The Nissan has higher single-engine torque.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Lexus CT 200 is better for city commuting due to its hybrid powertrain, offering fuel efficiency and a smooth CVT. The Nissan NV350 Urvan, with its diesel engine and larger size, is more suited for heavy-duty or commercial use.
Which vehicle offers more seating capacity?
The Lexus CT 200 seats 5 (2+3). The Nissan NV350 Urvan's seating capacity is not specified, but as a van with 3 doors, it likely accommodates more passengers, making it better for transporting groups.