Lifan 520 1.6 LX MT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Lifan 520 1.6 LX MT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Lifan 520 1.6 LX MT (2015) Lifan ₱588,000 | Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015) Suzuki ₱419,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1587cc | 796cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 104 PS @ 6000 rpm | 48 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 137 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Segment | B | A |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4370 | 3395 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1490 |
| Height (mm) | 1473 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2540 | 2360 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1155 | 745 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link Rigid Axle |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 13" Steel |
| Rear Wheels | — | 13" Steel |
| Front Tires | — | 145/70 R13 |
| Rear Tires | — | 145/70 R13 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | — | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Lifan 520 1.6 LX MT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015): which should you buy?
For most Filipino commuters, the Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT is the better value, priced at ₱419,000 versus ₱588,000 for the Lifan 520 1.6 LX MT. The Alto offers significantly lower power (48 PS vs 104 PS) but still delivers a practical 2+3 seating capacity in a compact hatchback body. Its 796cc engine is lighter, making it easier to maneuver in Manila traffic. The Lifan, while more powerful, is heavier at 4370mm vs 3395mm and costs nearly double, making it less practical for daily errands. Both vehicles have 100,000km/3-year warranties, FWD, and 5-speed manual transmissions. Choose the Alto if cost and simplicity matter most; opt for the Lifan if you prioritize raw horsepower for occasional tasks.