Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)

Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing a midsize pickup for work or family use, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L (2017) edges out the Mazda BT‑50 2.2L (2015) in several key areas. The Ranger is slightly cheaper at ₱1,328,000 versus ₱1,350,000 for the BT‑50, and it offers a newer model year and current availability, meaning parts and service support are more likely to be robust. Performance-wise the Ranger delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm, modestly higher than the BT‑50’s 150 PS and 375 Nm, giving a bit more pull for load‑carrying or hill climbs. Both share the same 6‑speed gearbox, but the Ranger’s manual transmission may appeal to drivers who prefer direct control and potentially better fuel economy, while the BT‑50’s automatic offers convenience in city traffic. Dimensionally, the BT‑50 is longer (5,365 mm vs 5,277 mm) but the Ranger is wider (2,163 mm) which can translate to a slightly roomier cabin and cargo width. Both have identical seating (2 + 3) and drivetrain (RWD, body‑on‑frame). Warranty terms are the same (100,000 km/3 years). If you prioritize lower price, newer model, higher power and manual control, the Ranger is the better pick. If you need an automatic transmission and a longer body for cargo length, the BT‑50 may suit you, but keep in mind its discontinued status could affect long‑term support.