Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) Mazda ₱1,985,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2191cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 175 PS @ 4500 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 420 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body On Frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4540 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1586 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 19 Aluminum Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 Aluminum Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone Automatic Aircon | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Mazda CX‑5 2.2 SkyActiv‑D and the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT sit in the J‑segment crossover/SUV space and share a diesel inline‑4, 6‑speed automatic and a 2+3 seating layout, but their key differences steer them toward different buyers. The mu‑X is priced lower at ₱1,845,000 versus ₱1,985,000 for the CX‑5, giving a ₱140,000 saving. Power‑wise, the Isuzu’s 3.0‑litre engine delivers a marginally higher peak output (177 PS) but slightly less torque (380 Nm) than the Mazda’s 175 PS/420 Nm, meaning the Mazda may feel stronger at low revs, especially for hill climbs. The CX‑5 offers all‑wheel drive, which adds traction for rainy Philippine roads, while the mu‑X is rear‑wheel drive only. Size is another factor: the mu‑X is longer (4825 mm vs 4540 mm) and wider (1860 mm vs unspecified for Mazda), providing a roomier cabin and larger footprint, but the CX‑5’s five‑door layout may be more convenient for loading. Both carry the same warranty (100,000 km/3 years) and the Mazda is discontinued, so parts availability could be a concern. Choose the Mazda if you need AWD, better low‑end torque and don’t mind a slightly higher price; opt for the Isuzu if you prefer a lower purchase price, a bit more horsepower, and a larger overall size for family use.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is priced at ₱1,845,000, which is ₱140,000 less than the 2015 Mazda CX‑5 2.2 SkyActiv‑D priced at ₱1,985,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X’s 3.0‑litre engine produces 177 PS, slightly higher than the Mazda CX‑5’s 175 PS, though the Mazda delivers more torque (420 Nm vs 380 Nm).
Is all‑wheel drive available?
Yes, the Mazda CX‑5 comes with AWD, while the Isuzu mu‑X is rear‑wheel drive only.
Which model offers more interior space?
The Isuzu mu‑X is longer (4825 mm) and wider (1860 mm) than the Mazda CX‑5 (4540 mm length, width not listed), indicating a roomier cabin for the mu‑X.