Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) Mazda ₱1,985,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2191cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 175 PS @ 4500 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 420 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body On Frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4540 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1586 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 19 Aluminum Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 Aluminum Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone Automatic Aircon | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SkyActiv-D (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, power, and practicality between the Mazda CX‑5 2.2 SkyActiv‑D (2015) and the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018), the Isuzu mu‑X emerges as the more compelling choice for most users. It is priced ₱2,145,000 versus ₱1,985,000 for the Mazda, yet offers a larger 3.0‑liter engine that delivers 177 PS compared to the Mazda’s 175 PS, and a higher peak torque of 380 Nm versus 420 Nm at lower rpm. The mu‑X’s 4WD drivetrain and longer wheelbase (4825 mm) provide better off‑road capability and more interior space, accommodating a 2+3+2 seating layout versus the Mazda’s 2+3. The Mazda, while slightly cheaper and featuring AWD, is discontinued and has a shorter wheelbase (4540 mm), limiting cargo room. Buyers prioritizing daily city driving and lower upfront cost might lean toward the Mazda, but those who need a robust 4WD with more seating and slightly higher torque will find the mu‑X superior. Both share a 6‑speed automatic transmission and similar warranty terms (100,000 km/3 years), so the decision hinges on drivetrain preference and seating needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑5 2.2 SkyActiv‑D (2015) is priced at ₱1,985,000, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) costs ₱2,145,000.
Which has more power?
Both vehicles produce similar peak horsepower: the Mazda delivers 175 PS and the Isuzu 177 PS, so power is nearly identical.
Which offers better torque?
The Mazda provides 420 Nm at 2000 rpm, whereas the Isuzu offers 380 Nm between 1800–2800 rpm; thus the Mazda has higher peak torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both have 6‑speed automatic transmissions and similar warranties, but the Mazda’s smaller size (4540 mm length) may be more maneuverable in city traffic, while the Isuzu’s larger 4WD setup offers more versatility for varied road conditions.