Mercedes-Benz V-Class V 220 CDI Extra Long Avantgarde (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mercedes-Benz V-Class V 220 CDI Extra Long Avantgarde (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz V-Class V 220 CDI Extra Long Avantgarde (2015) Mercedes-Benz ₱4,390,000 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2143cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged & Intercooled | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3200 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1400-2400 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | V | SUV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5140 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 2249 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1880 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3200 | 2984 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Seating Capacity | — | 2+3 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2084 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Wheels | 18 Light Alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Light Alloy | 19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Suspension | — | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | — | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Tires | — | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | — | 225/55R19 |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Aircon Semi Automatic | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Mercedes-Benz V-Class V 220 CDI Extra Long Avantgarde (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality between the 2015 Mercedes‑Benz V‑Class V 220 CDI Extra Long Avantgarde and the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD, the decision hinges on purpose. The Mercedes V‑Class is a diesel van built on a body‑on‑frame chassis, offering 163 PS and 380 Nm of torque with a 7‑speed automatic transmission, RWD layout, and five doors. Its price of ₱4 390 000 makes it the more expensive option, but its larger length (5 140 mm) and width (2 249 mm) provide ample cargo space for family or commercial use. In contrast, the Mustang Mach‑E is an all‑electric crossover SUV priced at ₱3 499 000, delivering 394 PS and a striking 676 Nm of torque from its electric motor. It features AWD, a unibody construction, and five doors with 2+3 seating, making it ideal for urban commuting or leisure trips. The Mach‑E’s shorter length (4 713 mm) and width (1 881 mm) offer better maneuverability in city traffic, while its electric powertrain promises lower running costs and zero tailpipe emissions. Thus, if a buyer prioritizes cargo capacity, diesel efficiency, and classic van utility, the Mercedes V‑Class is preferable. If lower purchase price, higher power output, electric drive, and city-friendly dimensions are more important, the Mustang Mach‑E is the better choice. Both vehicles provide modern amenities and contemporary design, but their distinct powertrains and segment focus guide the final selection.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD costs ₱3 499 000, while the Mercedes‑Benz V‑Class V 220 CDI Extra Long Avantgarde costs ₱4 390 000, making the Mustang cheaper by ₱891 000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mustang Mach‑E delivers 394 PS and 676 Nm of torque, whereas the Mercedes V‑Class provides 163 PS and 380 Nm; thus the Mustang has significantly higher power.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in Manila?
The Mustang’s electric motor, AWD, unibody construction, and compact dimensions (4 713 mm length, 1 881 mm width) make it more suited for urban commuting than the larger diesel van.
Which vehicle offers better cargo space?
The Mercedes V‑Class, being a van with 5 doors and larger overall dimensions (5 140 mm length, 2 249 mm width), provides more cargo space compared to the Mustang’s crossover SUV layout.