Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (2016)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱735,000 Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (2016) Toyota ₱901,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2016
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2477cc 1496cc
Valvetrain SOHC 8valve DOHC 16-valve
Compression Ratio 21.1 —
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i
Fuel Type Diesel Gas
Max Power 75 PS @ 4200 rpm 107 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm 140 Nm @ 4200 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T 5-Speed MT
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Performance & Economy
Emission Standard Euro-2 —
Body & Dimensions
Body Type AUV Sedan
Segment M B
Construction Body-on-frame Unibody
Doors 5 4
Seating Capacity 10 2+3
Length (mm) 4345 4410
Width (mm) 1650 1700
Height (mm) 1800 1475
Wheelbase (mm) 2620 2550
Curb Weight (kg) 1485 —
Fuel Tank (L) 55 —
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring MacPherson
Rear Suspension Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring Torsion Beam
Front Wheels 14 x 5.0JJ Steel 15
Rear Wheels 14 x 5.0JJ Steel 15
Front Tires 185 R14C-8PR 185/60 R15
Rear Tires 185 R14C-8PR 185/60 R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Disc
Steering Type Hydraulic Power
Steering Column no tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No Yes
Brake Assist No Yes
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm No Yes
Door Locking standard Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Vinyl Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Standard Key Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows No Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 2 6
Touchscreen No Yes
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB No Yes
AUX Input No Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (2016): which should you buy?

If you're on a budget and need a reliable car with good fuel efficiency, the Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT is your better choice. It's cheaper, has more power, and offers better practicality in terms of space and features.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper between the Mitsubishi Adventure and Toyota Vios?

The Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT starts at ₱901,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GX MT's price of ₱735,000.

Which car has more power between the Mitsubishi Adventure and Toyota Vios?

The Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT is more powerful with a max torque of 140 Nm compared to the Mitsubishi Adventure's 149 Nm.

Which vehicle offers better practicality for daily commuting?

The Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT, being a sedan and having more space (4410mm length), is better suited for daily commuting compared to the AUV of the Mitsubishi Adventure.

Which car has a longer warranty period between the Mitsubishi Adventure and Toyota Vios?

Both vehicles offer the same warranty period of 100,000km/3-years, so there's no difference in this regard.