Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱720,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Pick-up |
| Segment | M | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 5113 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1703 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 16'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 16'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality against utility, the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) is the better choice if you need a family‑oriented MPV with seating for up to seven and a lower entry price of ₱820,000. Its body‑on‑frame construction, 5‑door layout and 2+2+3 seating make it suited for daily commuting, school runs, and occasional cargo trips, while the 4‑speed automatic eases city driving. The Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis (2017) costs slightly less at ₱720,000 but is a stripped‑down 2‑door pick‑up chassis, offering only two seats and no enclosed cabin, which limits passenger comfort. It does deliver more power (120 PS vs 91 PS) and substantially higher torque (285 Nm vs 127 Nm), making it superior for heavy loads or off‑road work, yet its 5‑speed manual may be less convenient for urban traffic. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and RWD layout, but the APV’s automatic transmission and larger passenger capacity give it an edge for family use, whereas the Ranger targets small‑business or utility buyers who prioritize payload and torque over passenger space. Choose the Suzuki if you need a versatile people‑mover; choose the Ford if you need a basic workhorse for hauling and rugged tasks.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is priced at ₱720,000, which is ₱100,000 less than the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT at ₱820,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Ford Ranger produces 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, surpassing the Suzuki APV’s 91 PS and 127 Nm.
Which vehicle is more practical for a family?
The Suzuki APV offers a 5‑door MPV body, 2+2+3 seating for up to seven passengers, and an automatic transmission, making it more suitable for family use.
Is the Ford Ranger better for work or cargo?
Yes; its higher torque, larger dimensions (5113 mm length, 2163 mm width) and pick‑up body make it better suited for hauling and utility tasks, though it only seats two.