Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) Mini ₱3,250,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited/2-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | TwinPower Turbo |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 192 PS @ 5000 - 6000 |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 280 Nm @ 1250-4600 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 6- speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Convertible |
| Segment | M | S |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 3850 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1727 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1415 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2495 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1350 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 44 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt and telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Electronic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | led |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 7.2 sec |
| Top Speed | — | 230km/h |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016): which should you buy?
The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) is the superior choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing space and reliability, while the Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) offers fun driving for those valuing agility. The Alphard costs ₱3,379,000 versus ₱3,250,000, making it ₱129,000 more expensive. It delivers 275 PS of power against 192 PS, with a 5-door van layout (2+2+3 seats) ideal for families, while the Mini’s 6-speed transmission and convertible body suit individual use. Both have 4-speed AWD systems, but the Alphard’s longer wheelbase (4850 mm) and higher warranty (100,000km/3-years) address long-term value. For daily commuting, the Alphard’s seating capacity and power edge make it more practical, though the Mini’s lighter weight and sporty feel appeal to younger drivers. Given the Alphard’s discontinued status, buyers should weigh immediate cost against long-term ownership benefits.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) costs ₱3,250,000, while the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) costs ₱3,379,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) produces 275 PS, while the Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) produces 192 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) offers more seating (2+2+3) and higher power (275 PS vs 192 PS), making it more practical for daily use.
Is the Mini available now?
Yes, the Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) is currently available.