Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,838,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Hybrid |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1993cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 148 PS |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | E-CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4691 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1866 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1691 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2700 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1780 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 57 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/60R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/60R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the 2015 Toyota Alphard and the 2026 Honda CR-V hybrid boils down to priorities. The Alphard, at ₱3.379M, is a discontinued luxury van with a powerful 3.5L V6 (275 PS) and ample 7-seat capacity, ideal for families or VIP transport seeking opulence and space. However, its age and 4-speed transmission result in higher fuel consumption, and it lacks modern safety tech. The CR-V RS e:HEV, at ₱2.838M, is a current model offering excellent fuel efficiency via its hybrid system (148 PS) and an E-CVT, plus the security of AWD. It seats 5, making it more practical for daily commuting and tighter parking. The CR-V wins on value, efficiency, and modern features, while the Alphard reigns supreme in raw power and passenger capacity. Buyers who prioritize prestige and max seating should choose the Alphard. Those wanting a newer, more efficient, and lower-maintenance vehicle for everyday use should pick the CR-V.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Honda CR-V is cheaper at ₱2,838,000, while the Toyota Alphard is priced at ₱3,379,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Alphard has a more powerful 3.5L V6 engine producing 275 PS, compared to the Honda CR-V's hybrid system with 148 PS.
Which is better for fuel economy?
The data does not provide fuel economy figures, but the Honda CR-V's hybrid powertrain and E-CVT are typically more efficient than the Alphard's older 3.5L V6 and 4-speed automatic transmission.
Which has more seats?
The Toyota Alphard seats 7 passengers in a 2+2+3 layout, while the Honda CR-V seats 5 in a 2+3 configuration.