Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) Audi ₱4,400,000 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 5100-6000 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 280 Nm @ 1800-5000 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 240 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 9.4 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 16.7 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 13.0 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | SUV |
| Construction | Space Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4178 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 1842 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1352 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2468 | 2984 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1280 | 2084 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.5" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.5" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R16 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R16 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) is the smarter choice. It is significantly cheaper at ₱3,499,000 vs. the Audi TT’s ₱4,400,000, and offers more power (394 PS vs. 200 PS) and more torque (676 Nm vs. 280 Nm). As a current-model electric midsize SUV, it provides excellent daily practicality with 5 doors, seating for 5, and a unibody SUV construction—ideal for Philippine road conditions. The Audi TT, while a stylish sports coupe with a 6.9-second 0–100 km/h time and a top speed of 240 km/h, is discontinued, older (2016), less powerful, and less practical for families. It has only 2 doors and no mention of electric range or charging infrastructure—a critical factor in the Philippines. The Mach-E also comes with a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, whereas the TT’s warranty is unlimited but only 2 years. If you prioritize driving engagement and coupe styling, the TT has its charm, but for value, power, space, and modern tech, the Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior. Budget-conscious buyers seeking a daily driver with performance will find the Mach-E unbeatable in this comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Audi TT or the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD is cheaper at ₱3,499,000, while the Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic is priced at ₱4,400,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E produces 394 PS and 676 Nm of torque, significantly more than the Audi TT's 200 PS and 280 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting and family use?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is better for daily commuting because it is an electric SUV with 5 doors, seating for 5, and a practical midsize crossover body. The Audi TT is a 2-door coupe with limited space.
Is the Audi TT more fuel-efficient than the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Fuel economy data is only provided for the Audi TT (9.4 km/L city, 16.7 km/L highway). No fuel economy figures are given for the Mustang Mach-E, as it is an electric vehicle, so a direct fuel-efficiency comparison cannot be made from the data.