Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) Chevrolet ₱791,888 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1349cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.8 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV |
| Segment | B | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4300 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1735 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1504 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2499 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut-type and Stabilizer bar | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rear Tosrion beam non-independent | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT and Suzuki Ertiga GL AT boils down to budget and body style. The Sail is cheaper at ₱791,888 vs. ₱865,000, and offers slightly more power (100 PS vs. 96 PS) with a manual transmission. However, the Ertiga provides an automatic transmission, which is more convenient for city driving, and seats 7 passengers (2+2+3) compared to the Sail's 5-seat capacity. If you need a family vehicle with space for more passengers and ease of driving, the Ertiga is worth the extra cost. If you're on a tight budget and prefer a sedan with a manual gearbox, the Sail is a practical choice. Both have similar warranties (3 years/100,000 km). The Sail is better suited for singles or couples, while the Ertiga excels for larger families.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Chevrolet Sail or Suzuki Ertiga?
The Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT is cheaper at ₱791,888 compared to the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT at ₱865,000.
Which car has more power?
The Chevrolet Sail produces 100 PS, slightly more than the Suzuki Ertiga's 96 PS, but the Ertiga has higher torque (130 Nm vs 127 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting in heavy traffic?
The Suzuki Ertiga's automatic transmission is more convenient for stop-and-go traffic, making it a better daily commuter than the Chevrolet Sail's manual gearbox.
How many passengers can each car seat?
The Chevrolet Sail seats 5 (2+3) while the Suzuki Ertiga seats 7 (2+2+3), making the Ertiga more suitable for larger families.