Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) Chevrolet ₱791,888 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1349cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.8 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV AUV |
| Segment | B | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4300 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1735 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1504 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2499 | 2625 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut-type and Stabilizer bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rear Tosrion beam non-independent | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical and practical daily commuter, the 2016 Chevrolet Sail 1.3 MT LT is the better choice. It comes in at ₱791,888 versus the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT’s ₱763,000, but offers a higher maximum power of 100 PS at 6000 rpm compared to the APV’s 91 PS. Both vehicles share a 5‑speed manual transmission and a similar warranty of 100,000 km/3 years. The Sail’s inline‑4 DOHC engine provides a slightly higher compression ratio (10.8) and delivers 127 Nm of torque at 4000 rpm, while the APV’s SOHC engine also delivers 127 Nm but at a higher rpm (4500). In terms of practicality, the Sail is a 4‑door sedan with seating for five (2+3), making it suitable for small families or commuters needing a compact yet spacious interior. The APV, on the other hand, is an MPV AUV with 5 doors and seating for eight (3+3+2), which is advantageous if you need more passenger capacity or cargo space. However, the APV’s rear‑wheel drive and body‑on‑frame construction may result in a less refined ride for daily city driving. Overall, choose the Sail if you prioritize power, fuel efficiency, and a comfortable sedan experience; opt for the APV if you need larger seating capacity and an MPV layout.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is slightly cheaper at ₱763,000 compared to the Chevrolet Sail’s ₱791,888.
Which has more power?
The Chevrolet Sail offers 100 PS at 6000 rpm, while the APV delivers 91 PS at 5750 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Sail’s sedan body, front‑wheel drive, and higher power make it more suitable for daily commuting in city traffic.
Which has greater passenger capacity?
The APV can seat up to eight passengers (3+3+2), whereas the Sail seats five (2+3).