Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) Chevrolet ₱917,888 |
Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015)
Suzuki
₱975,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1485cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.2 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 109 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV AUV |
| Segment | B | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4300 | 4230 |
| Width (mm) | 1735 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1504 | 1855 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2499 | 2625 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut-type and Stabilizer bar | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Rear Tosrion beam non-independent | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 14x5.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 14x5.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) and the Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (2015), the decision hinges on your primary need: daily commuting vs. passenger/cargo capacity. The Sail is cheaper at ₱917,888 versus ₱975,000, offers more power (109 PS vs. 91 PS) and torque (141 Nm vs. 127 Nm), and has a more modern DOHC engine with a 4-speed automatic transmission—ideal for city driving and ease of use. Its sedan body and FWD layout provide better fuel efficiency and handling on paved roads. However, the Suzuki APV, though more expensive and less powerful, is a body-on-frame MPV/AUV with RWD, seating for 8 (2+3+3) and a 5-speed manual. It's built for durability, rough roads, and carrying more passengers or cargo, making it suitable for provincial routes or large families. The Sail is better for a budget-conscious buyer seeking a comfortable daily driver, while the APV suits those needing space and ruggedness. Note: The APV's SOHC engine and older platform may feel less refined, but its 5-door layout offers easier access. Choose based on whether you prioritize power and modernity (Sail) or practicality and capacity (APV).
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ is cheaper at ₱917,888 compared to the Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT at ₱975,000.
Which has more power?
The Chevrolet Sail produces 109 PS and 141 Nm of torque, significantly more than the Suzuki APV's 91 PS and 127 Nm.
Which is better for a large family?
The Suzuki APV seats 8 passengers (2+3+3) and has a body-on-frame construction, making it more suitable for large families or cargo, while the Sail seats only 5.
Which is better for daily city driving?
The Chevrolet Sail, with its automatic transmission, FWD, and more powerful engine, is better suited for daily city commuting, offering easier driving and likely better fuel economy.