Mitsubishi Montero Sport GT 4WD AT (2016) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Montero Sport GT 4WD AT (2016) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Montero Sport GT 4WD AT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱2,164,000 | Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025) Tesla ₱2,109,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 4-year/80,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2442cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 15.5 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooled MIVEC, VGT | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 181 PS @ 3500 rpm | 257 PS |
| Max Torque | 430 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 360 Nm |
| Transmission | 8-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Executive Sedan |
| Segment | J | Sedan |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4785 | 4720 |
| Width (mm) | 1815 | 2089 |
| Height (mm) | 1805 | 1441 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2800 | 2875 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2030 | 1760 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 68 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Red Multi-Coat, Pearl White Multi-Coat, Solid Black, Deep Blue Metallic, Midnight Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Springs and Stabilizer Bar | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 3-Link Coil Springs with Stabilizer Bar | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18x7.5 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18x7.5 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 235/45R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 235/45R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt and telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | Yes | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Operation System | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mitsubishi Montero Sport GT 4WD AT (2016) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and everyday practicality, the Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range edges out the Mitsubishi Montero Sport GT 4WD AT (2016) despite being a sedan rather than an SUV. The Model 3 is slightly cheaper at ₱2,109,000 versus ₱2,164,000, and it delivers higher peak power (257 PS vs 181 PS) while offering a modern electric drivetrain with zero‑fuel operating costs. Its unibody construction, compact dimensions (4720 mm L × 2089 mm W × 1441 mm H) and four‑door layout make it easier to maneuver and park in urban Manila traffic, and the 2+3 seating arrangement suits small families or ride‑sharing. The Montero Sport, on the other hand, provides genuine 4WD, a robust 2.4‑L turbo‑diesel engine with 430 Nm of torque at low rpm, and a body‑on‑frame SUV platform that appeals to buyers needing off‑road capability or higher ground clearance. Its warranty is shorter (100 000 km/3 years) compared to Tesla’s 4‑year/80 000 km coverage. Choose the Tesla if you prioritize lower running costs, higher power, and city‑friendly size; opt for the Montero Sport only if you require diesel torque, 4WD, and SUV utility for occasional rugged use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD Standard Range costs ₱2,109,000, which is ₱55,000 less than the Mitsubishi Montero Sport GT 4WD AT priced at ₱2,164,000.
Which has more power?
The Tesla Model 3 produces 257 PS, surpassing the Montero Sport’s 181 PS, giving the electric sedan higher peak power.
Is the Montero Sport better for off‑road or heavy loads?
Yes, the Montero Sport offers a 4WD drivetrain, body‑on‑frame construction, and a diesel engine with 430 Nm of torque at low rpm, making it more suitable for off‑road or load‑carrying tasks.
Which car is more practical for daily city commuting?
The Tesla Model 3’s smaller dimensions, unibody sedan design, and electric powertrain make it more practical for navigating Manila’s congested streets and parking compared to the larger, body‑on‑frame SUV.