Nissan Almera 1.5L E AT (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Almera 1.5L E AT (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan Almera 1.5L E AT (2016) Nissan ₱824,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Natuarlly Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 134 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV AUV |
| Segment | B | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4425 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1505 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2600 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1056 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 41 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Springs & Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electric Power Steering (Speed Sensing) | — |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan Almera 1.5L E AT (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2016 Nissan Almera 1.5L E AT and the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT hinges on your primary need: daily commuting or people/cargo hauling. The Almera is a B-segment sedan with a modern unibody construction, offering a refined ride and better fuel efficiency for city driving. It has a more powerful engine (99 PS vs 91 PS) and an automatic transmission, making it easier to drive in traffic. At ₱824,000, it's pricier but provides a car-like experience with a 4-speed A/T. In contrast, the Suzuki APV is a body-on-frame MPV/AUV with a manual transmission and RWD, built for durability and maximum seating capacity (8 seats in a 3+3+2 layout). It's cheaper at ₱763,000 and has a larger 1.6L engine, but its SOHC design and older platform mean lower refinement. The APV excels for large families or businesses needing to transport many people or cargo, especially in provincial areas where rough roads are common. The Almera is better for daily commuting and urban use, while the APV is the practical workhorse for those who need space and ruggedness over comfort.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is cheaper at ₱763,000 compared to the Nissan Almera 1.5L E AT at ₱824,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Nissan Almera has a higher max power of 99 PS, while the Suzuki APV produces 91 PS. The Almera also has more torque (134 Nm vs 127 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan Almera is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, unibody construction for a smoother ride, and sedan body style that is easier to maneuver in traffic.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Suzuki APV seats up to 8 passengers (3+3+2 layout), while the Nissan Almera seats only 5 (2+3). The APV is ideal for larger families or group transport.