Suzuki Ciaz GL MT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ciaz GL MT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ciaz GL MT (2016) Suzuki ₱795,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 92 Hp @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV |
| Segment | B | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4490 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1730 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2650 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1010 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/65/R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ciaz GL MT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the 2016 Suzuki Ciaz GL MT and the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GL AT, the choice hinges on your primary need: daily commuting with a focus on affordability versus family-oriented practicality with automatic convenience. The Ciaz is ₱70,000 cheaper at ₱795,000, making it the more budget-friendly option. It offers a sedan body with a 5-speed manual transmission, which may appeal to driving enthusiasts or those looking to save on fuel and maintenance. However, its rear-wheel-drive layout is less common in this segment. The Ertiga, at ₱865,000, is an MPV with a 4-speed automatic transmission, making it easier to drive in traffic. It seats up to 7 passengers (2+2+3) compared to the Ciaz's 5, and has a shorter length (4265mm vs 4490mm) for easier parking. Both share the same 1.3L engine, but the Ertiga produces slightly more power (96 PS vs 92 Hp) and torque is identical at 130 Nm. If you prioritize passenger and cargo space for a family, the Ertiga is the better choice. If you want a lower price and a manual transmission for a more engaging drive, go for the Ciaz.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Suzuki Ciaz or Ertiga?
The Suzuki Ciaz GL MT is cheaper at ₱795,000, while the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT costs ₱865,000, a difference of ₱70,000.
Which has more power, the Ciaz or Ertiga?
The Ertiga has slightly more power at 96 PS (about 94.7 Hp) compared to the Ciaz's 92 Hp, though torque is identical at 130 Nm.
Which is better for a family with 5 or more passengers?
The Ertiga is better for families as it seats up to 7 passengers (2+2+3) and has an MPV body with more cargo space, while the Ciaz seats only 5.
Which is easier to drive in city traffic?
The Ertiga with its 4-speed automatic transmission is easier to drive in traffic than the Ciaz's 5-speed manual, and its shorter length (4265mm vs 4490mm) aids maneuverability.