Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) Suzuki ₱699,000 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000
Overview
Model Year 2016 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1373cc 1590cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve SOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Fuel Injection Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gasoline
Max Power 96 PS @ 6000 rpm 91 PS @ 5750 rpm
Max Torque 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain FWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type MPV MPV AUV
Segment M MPV
Construction Unibody Body on Frame
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+2+3 3+3+2
Length (mm) 4265 4155
Width (mm) 1695 1655
Height (mm) 1985 1865
Wheelbase (mm) 2740 2625
Curb Weight (kg) 1155 1270
Fuel Tank (L) 45 46
Exterior Colors Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs
Front Wheels 15'' Steel 14
Rear Wheels 15'' Steel 14
Front Tires 185/65 R15 185/60 R14
Rear Tires 185/65 R15 185/60 R14
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type EPS
Steering Column tilt + tele tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No No
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No No
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Standard
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual Aircon
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Standard Key Standard Key
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display Yes No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows No No
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 2 2
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer on a budget, the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GA at ₱699,000 is the more practical choice. It's cheaper, has a more modern engine (96 PS, 130 Nm) with DOHC and fuel injection, and offers a car-like unibody ride suitable for daily commuting. Its 7-seat MPV layout (2+2+3) is ideal for families. The 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT costs ₱763,000, has an older SOHC engine with slightly less power (91 PS, 127 Nm), and uses a body-on-frame construction typical of AUVs, which is more rugged but less comfortable on paved roads. The APV's RWD layout may be better for heavy loads or rough terrain, but its higher price and older design make it less appealing for typical city use. Choose the Ertiga for better fuel efficiency, modern features, and lower cost. Choose the APV if you need a durable workhorse for cargo or off-road conditions.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper?

The 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GA is cheaper at ₱699,000, while the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT costs ₱763,000.

Which has more power?

The Ertiga has slightly more power at 96 PS, compared to the APV's 91 PS. Torque is also higher in the Ertiga (130 Nm vs 127 Nm).

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its unibody construction, which provides a smoother ride, and its FWD drivetrain for better fuel economy.

Which is more durable for rough roads or cargo?

The APV is more durable for rough roads and cargo because of its body-on-frame construction and RWD drivetrain, making it suitable for heavy loads and off-road conditions.