Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL MT (2016) Suzuki ₱825,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 1175 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL MT (2016): which should you buy?
For the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GL, the choice between the AT and MT variants comes down to budget and driving preference. Both share the same 1.4L inline-4 engine (96 PS, 130 Nm) and offer identical seating (2+2+3), body type, and warranty. The AT costs ₱865,000, while the MT is ₱40,000 cheaper at ₱825,000 – a notable saving. However, the AT’s 4-speed automatic is easier to drive in heavy traffic, making it ideal for Metro Manila commuters who prioritize convenience. The MT’s 5-speed manual may appeal to budget-conscious buyers or those who enjoy more control, but fuel economy and performance are not specified in the data, so we cannot claim any difference there. Both are FWD MPVs with the same dimensions (4265mm length). For daily commuting and stop-and-go traffic, the AT is the better choice despite the higher price. For tight budgets or drivers who prefer manuals, the MT offers the same space and reliability for less. Neither variant has additional features listed, so the decision rests primarily on transmission and price.
Frequently asked questions
Which variant is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL MT (2016) is ₱825,000, while the AT is ₱865,000. The MT saves you ₱40,000.
Are there any power or torque differences?
No. Both variants use the same 1373cc engine producing 96 PS at 6000 rpm and 130 Nm at 4000 rpm. Performance is identical.
Which is better for Metro Manila traffic?
The AT (automatic) is easier to drive in heavy traffic since it eliminates clutch operation. The MT requires more effort in stop-and-go conditions.
Do they have different fuel economy?
The provided data does not include fuel economy figures for either variant, so we cannot compare. In practice, manual transmissions often offer slightly better fuel efficiency, but this is not confirmed from the given specs.