Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Nissan Almera 1.0 EL Turbo M/T (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Nissan Almera 1.0 EL Turbo M/T (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Nissan Almera 1.0 EL Turbo M/T (2024) Nissan ₱845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 100 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 160 Nm @ 2400 - 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | 5-M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Family Sedan |
| Segment | M | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4495 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1740 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 1460 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2620 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 1103 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 35 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Moon Pearl Grey, Galaxy Black, Gun Metallic, Cayenne Red |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 195/55/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 195/55/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Nissan Almera 1.0 EL Turbo M/T (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing space, practicality and lower upfront cost, the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT 2016 is the better choice. It offers a generous 2+2+3 seating layout and five doors, making it ideal for families or groups needing extra passenger capacity. Its price of ₱865,000 is slightly higher than the Almera but still competitive for a 2016 MPV. The Ertiga’s inline‑4 engine delivers 96 PS at 6000 rpm and 130 Nm torque, suitable for everyday driving. Conversely, the Nissan Almera 1.0 EL Turbo M/T 2024 targets a different segment: it is a compact family sedan with only 2+3 seating and four doors, priced at ₱845,000. Its turbocharged inline‑3 engine produces 100 PS and a higher torque of 160 Nm, offering better acceleration. If you need more interior room or plan to carry more passengers regularly, choose the Ertiga; if you prefer a newer model with a turbo engine and a sedan body style for city driving, the Almera is preferable.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan Almera 1.0 EL Turbo M/T costs ₱845,000, while the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT 2016 is priced at ₱865,000.
Which has more power?
The Almera’s turbocharged inline‑3 engine produces 100 PS, slightly higher than the Ertiga’s 96 PS.
Which offers more seating capacity?
The Ertiga provides a 2+2+3 layout with five doors, whereas the Almera seats 2+3 in a four‑door sedan.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both are front‑wheel drive and suitable for daily use; the Almera’s turbo engine offers better torque (160 Nm) for city driving, while the Ertiga’s larger cabin may be preferable for family commuting.