Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025) Toyota ₱818,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 139 PS |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Van |
| Segment | M | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4965 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 2180 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 1775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 55 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025): which should you buy?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT, priced at ₱865,000, offers a 1.4‑liter inline‑4 engine that delivers 96 PS and 130 Nm, with a 4‑speed automatic transmission and FWD layout. It seats seven in a 2+2+3 configuration, making it ideal for families needing extra passenger space and convenient automatic shifting. The Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB, priced lower at ₱818,000, is a 2.0‑liter inline‑4 that produces 139 PS and 183 Nm, but it is a manual RWD van with only two seats and a body‑on‑frame construction, suited for light commercial use or drivers who prefer manual control. In terms of power and torque, the Tamaraw outperforms the Ertiga by a significant margin; however, its seating capacity and automatic transmission make the Ertiga more practical for daily family commuting. If you prioritize passenger comfort, ease of driving, and a higher seating capacity, the Ertiga is the better choice. If you need more power for cargo or prefer a manual transmission and lower price, the Tamaraw is suitable. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you value passenger space and automatic convenience or higher engine output and a manual setup for commercial tasks.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB is cheaper at ₱818,000 compared to the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT at ₱865,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB has a higher power output of 139 PS versus the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT’s 96 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting with family?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT, with its 7‑seat configuration and automatic transmission, is more suitable for daily family commuting.
Which vehicle offers better torque?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB provides higher torque at 183 Nm compared to the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT’s 130 Nm.