Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,778,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2393cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 147 PS @ 3400 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 400 Nm @ 1600-2000 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1835 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2745 | 2815 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1795 | 1500 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, Coil Springs | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) and the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) hinges on priorities. The Fortuner is significantly cheaper at ₱1,778,000 but is a 2016 model with uncertain availability, meaning you'd likely buy used. It offers a robust body-on-frame SUV, diesel engine with massive torque (400 Nm) for off-road and towing, but only 147 PS and rear-wheel drive. The Destinator, at ₱1,929,000, is a current 2026 model with modern features, a unibody crossover for better on-road comfort and efficiency, a more powerful gasoline engine (163 PS) but less torque (250 Nm), and front-wheel drive with CVT. The Fortuner seats 7 in a classic SUV layout, while the Destinator also seats 7 but as a midsize crossover. If you need off-road capability, towing, or diesel efficiency and don't mind an older vehicle, choose the Fortuner. If you prioritize daily commuting, modern design, warranty, and newer tech, go for the Destinator. The Destinator's two-tone colors and CVT also appeal to urban families. Overall, the Destinator is the more sensible daily driver for most Filipinos, while the Fortuner is for serious off-road enthusiasts on a budget.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Toyota Fortuner or the Mitsubishi Destinator?
The Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) is cheaper at ₱1,778,000, compared to the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) at ₱1,929,000. However, the Fortuner is a 2016 model and not currently available as new.
Which has more power and torque?
The Mitsubishi Destinator has higher horsepower (163 PS vs 147 PS), while the Toyota Fortuner has much higher torque (400 Nm vs 250 Nm). The Fortuner's diesel engine provides stronger low-end pulling power.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Destinator is better for daily commuting due to its modern unibody construction, front-wheel drive, and CVT, offering a smoother and more fuel-efficient ride on paved roads. The Fortuner's body-on-frame design and diesel engine are better suited for off-road or heavy-duty use.
Which vehicle has more seating capacity?
Both vehicles seat 7 passengers in a 2+3+2 configuration. The Fortuner is a traditional SUV, while the Destinator is a midsize crossover SUV/MPV, so interior space and layout may differ, but both offer three rows.