Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,208,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 136 PS @ 5600 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 183 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | M | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4735 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1795 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2750 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link w/ Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 205/65 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 205/65 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing budget and fuel efficiency, the 2016 Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT is the clear choice, offering a price of ₱1,208,000 compared to the 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT's ₱1,259,000. While the Xpander is the newer model, the Innova delivers significantly more power with 136 PS versus the Xpander's 105 PS, and features a robust 6-speed automatic transmission compared to the Xpander's 4-speed unit. However, the Xpander wins on practicality and safety with a modern 2+3+2 seating layout, unibody construction, and a 3-year/100,000km warranty, whereas the Innova lacks specific warranty or seating configuration data in the provided text. Choose the Innova for performance and lower cost, or the Xpander for a newer, safer, albeit less powerful, family MPV.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2016 Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT is cheaper at ₱1,208,000 compared to the 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT priced at ₱1,259,000.
Which car has more power?
The 2016 Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT is more powerful with 136 PS, whereas the 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT produces only 105 PS.
Which model is better for daily commuting?
The 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT is likely better for daily commuting due to its newer 2026 model year, unibody construction, and specific 2+3+2 seating layout.
Do these vehicles have 0-100 km/h times?
The provided data does not contain 0-100 km/h acceleration times for either the Toyota Innova or the Mitsubishi Xpander.