Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) Toyota ₱1,974,000 | Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020) Mitsubishi ₱1,927,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 2442cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 181 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T ECT | 8-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 4785 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1815 |
| Height (mm) | 1715 | 1805 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2800 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 68 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White Diamond, Jet Black Mica, Blade Silver Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1910 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Sport Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020): which should you buy?
The Toyota Rav-4 (₱1,974,000) is the better daily commuter; its 2016 FWD platform with 180 PS is adequate for Philippine roads, while the Mitsubishi Montero Sport (₱1,927,000) costs less but trades power and practicality for AWD and diesel torque. Choose the Rav-4 if you prioritize lower running costs and rear-wheel-drive reliability. Opt for the Montero Sport if budget is tighter and you value heavier torque for off-road confidence.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Montero Sport costs ₱1,927,000, while the Toyota Rav-4 costs ₱1,974,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Montero Sport delivers 181 PS vs. 180 PS for the Toyota Rav-4.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Rav-4 is suitable for daily commuting thanks to its 180 PS, 6-speed auto transmission, and FWD layout.
What drivetrain does each vehicle use?
The Toyota Rav-4 uses FWD; the Mitsubishi Montero Sport uses RWD.