Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱720,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick-up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5113 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1703 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2625 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 46 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1270 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2017 Ford Ranger Cab & Chassis 2.2L 4x2 MT (₱720,000) and the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (₱763,000), the choice hinges on intended use. The Ford Ranger is a bare-bones two-seater pickup with a turbocharged diesel engine producing 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, making it ideal for heavy-duty work, towing, and off-road applications. Its 2.2L engine offers strong low-end torque for hauling cargo. In contrast, the Suzuki APV is a seven-seater MPV/AUV with a naturally aspirated 1.6L gasoline engine (91 PS, 127 Nm), better suited for family transport and daily commuting. The APV is more practical for carrying passengers, but its engine is less powerful and fuel-efficient for heavy loads. The Ranger is cheaper by ₱43,000, but lacks passenger space. If you need a workhorse for business or farm use, choose the Ford Ranger. If you need a family vehicle for daily errands and school runs, the Suzuki APV is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Cab & Chassis is cheaper at ₱720,000 compared to the Suzuki APV at ₱763,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger produces 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, significantly more than the Suzuki APV's 91 PS and 127 Nm.
Which is better for family use?
The Suzuki APV seats up to 7 passengers (3+3+2) and has a body-on-frame MPV design, making it more suitable for family transport than the 2-seater Ford Ranger.
Which has better fuel economy?
The data does not provide fuel economy figures. However, the Ford Ranger's diesel engine is typically more fuel-efficient for heavy loads, while the Suzuki APV's gasoline engine may be more economical for light city driving.