Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱780,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick-up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1703 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2625 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 46 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1270 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the 2017 Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4x2 MT (₱780k) and the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (₱763k) hinges on intended use. The Ranger is a hardcore utility pick-up: its 2.2L turbo-diesel delivers 120 PS and 285 Nm, ideal for hauling heavy cargo or towing, with excellent fuel economy typical of diesels. However, it seats only 2, making it impractical for families. The APV, on the other hand, is a versatile MPV/AUV with body-on-frame construction, seating 3+3+2 (up to 8 passengers), perfect for family trips or as a service vehicle. Its 1.6L gasoline engine (91 PS, 127 Nm) is significantly less powerful, so it struggles under heavy loads and has higher fuel consumption. The APV is slightly cheaper by ₱17,000, but the Ranger offers far more pulling power. If you need a workhorse for construction, agriculture, or heavy cargo, get the Ranger. For a budget-friendly family shuttle that can handle rough roads, the APV is the better choice. Both come with the same 3-year/100k km warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is cheaper at ₱763,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Single Cab at ₱780,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Ranger produces 120 PS and 285 Nm, far exceeding the Suzuki APV's 91 PS and 127 Nm, making it significantly more powerful for heavy loads.
Which is better for daily commuting with family?
The Suzuki APV is better for family commuting because it seats up to 8 passengers, while the Ranger only seats 2. However, the APV's gasoline engine may cost more to run.
What type of fuel do they use?
The Ford Ranger uses diesel, offering better fuel economy for high-mileage use, while the Suzuki APV uses gasoline, which is less efficient but more readily available.