Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2017) Mazda ₱1,270,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated, S-VT |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Sedan |
| Segment | Pick-Up | C |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4580 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1450 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1304 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18x7.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18x7.0 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/45/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/45/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | HID + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs cargo capacity, off‑road capability, and higher torque for hauling, the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT is the clear choice. It costs ₱1,328,000, about ₱58,000 more than the Mazda 3, but offers a pickup body, a longer wheelbase (5277 mm vs 4580 mm), and a robust 385 Nm of torque at low rpm, which is ideal for loading goods or tackling steep roads. Its 6‑speed manual and rear‑wheel drive suit drivers who prefer more control and ruggedness. Conversely, the Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv‑R AT, priced at ₱1,270,000, is a compact sedan with a lighter 1998 cc naturally‑aspirated engine delivering 155 PS and 200 Nm, making it more fuel‑efficient and easier to maneuver in city traffic. Its front‑wheel‑drive layout and unibody construction provide a smoother ride for daily commuting and family use, seating five comfortably. In summary, choose the Ranger if you prioritize payload, torque, and a pickup platform for work or adventure; choose the Mazda 3 if you want a lower‑priced, city‑friendly sedan with adequate power for everyday driving.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda 3 Sedan is cheaper at ₱1,270,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak at ₱1,328,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak produces 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, while the Mazda 3 offers 155 PS and 200 Nm, making the Ranger more powerful, especially in low‑rpm torque.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mazda 3 Sedan is better suited for city commuting due to its smaller size, front‑wheel drive, unibody construction, and lower engine displacement, which generally translates to better fuel economy and maneuverability.
Which model provides more cargo space and utility?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak, being a pickup with a longer length (5277 mm) and a 2+3 seating layout, offers far greater cargo capacity and utility than the sedan‑styled Mazda 3.