Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs GWM Cannon Pilot 4×4 AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs GWM Cannon Pilot 4×4 AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | GWM Cannon Pilot 4×4 AT (2025) GWM ₱1,338,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 7 years or 200,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 161 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 400 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 8-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5425 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1883 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1882 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3230 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 78 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Pittsburg Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2230 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 245/70R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 245/70R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | Yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs GWM Cannon Pilot 4×4 AT (2025): which should you buy?
Both the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT and the 2025 GWM Cannon Pilot 4×4 AT sit in the same price bracket (₱1,328,000 vs ₱1,338,000) and target buyers who need a versatile pickup for work or family outings. The Ranger, despite being six years older, offers a proven 2.2‑liter turbo diesel that delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm, paired with a 6‑speed manual and rear‑wheel drive. Its longer wheelbase (5277 mm) and wider track (2163 mm) give a slightly larger footprint, which can aid load stability. However, it comes with a shorter warranty (100,000 km/3 years) and lacks the modern 4‑wheel‑drive system. The GWM Cannon Pilot, on the other hand, brings a newer 2.0‑liter turbo diesel with a marginal power edge (161 PS) and higher torque (400 Nm). Its 8‑speed automatic and permanent 4WD make it more capable off‑road and easier for city driving. The extended warranty of 7 years or 200,000 km adds peace of mind for long‑term owners. For buyers who prioritize a newer platform, automatic transmission, 4WD capability, and a robust warranty, the Cannon Pilot is the better choice. Those who prefer a manual gearbox, slightly larger dimensions, and are comfortable with a shorter warranty may still find the Ranger a reliable, cost‑effective option.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is priced at ₱1,328,000, which is ₱10,000 less than the GWM Cannon Pilot’s ₱1,338,000 price.
Which pickup has more power and torque?
The GWM Cannon Pilot produces 161 PS and 400 Nm of torque, slightly higher than the Ranger’s 160 PS and 385 Nm.
What are the key drivetrain differences?
The Ranger is rear‑wheel drive with a 6‑speed manual, while the Cannon Pilot offers permanent 4‑wheel drive and an 8‑speed automatic transmission.
Which vehicle offers a better warranty?
The Cannon Pilot provides a 7‑year or 200,000 km warranty, far longer than the Ranger’s 3‑year or 100,000 km coverage.