Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG TRQ L AT 4×2 (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG TRQ L AT 4×2 (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | MG TRQ L AT 4×2 (2026) MG ₱1,338,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1966cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 161 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 400 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 8-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5365 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1960 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1857 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 73 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Scarlet Red exclusive for the Automatic variant, Warm White, Astral Silver, Metal Black, and Metal Ash Gray |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1945 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 245/70R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 245/70R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG TRQ L AT 4×2 (2026): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱1,328,000 versus ₱1,338,888 for the MG TRQ L AT 4×2 (2026). The Ranger offers more torque (385 Nm vs 400 Nm) and a 6-speed manual transmission that can provide better control in varied terrain. While the MG has a higher power output (161 PS vs 160 PS) and an 8-speed automatic, the Ranger’s lower price and simpler drivetrain make it more practical for daily commuting or light hauling. The choice depends on budget: the Ranger suits those prioritizing affordability and manual operation, while the MG appeals to buyers valuing extra power and convenience.