Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,266,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2439cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 183 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2250 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5265 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1865 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1775 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3130 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 75 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Yamabuki Orange, Solid White, Diamond White, Blade Silver, Graphite Grey, Solid Red, Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1815 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 205/R16C |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 205/R16C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2017 is the better value for most Filipino buyers seeking a reliable daily driver. At ₱1,328,000, it is ₱62,000 cheaper than the ₱1,266,000 Mitsubishi Triton 2024, yet it offers identical power (160 PS vs 183 PS) and warranty coverage (100,000km/3-years). The Ranger’s 2198cc engine is smaller but still delivers the necessary torque for Philippine roads, while the Triton’s 2439cc unit provides a modest power edge. Both are RWD pickups with 4 doors and 2+3 seating, but the Ranger’s lower price and proven 2017 build make it the more accessible option for budget-conscious users prioritizing practicality over outright power. The Triton’s 2024 model reflects newer manufacturing standards, but the Ranger’s affordability and existing market reputation justify its position for first-time buyers or those avoiding higher depreciation costs.