Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018) Nissan ₱1,280,000
Overview
Model Year 2017 2018
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 3-years/ 100,000km
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2198cc 2488cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 160 PS @ 3200 rpm 129 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed M/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain RWD RWD
Compression Ratio 15:1
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Pick Up Van
Segment Pick-Up Van
Doors 4 3
Seating Capacity 2+3 3
Length (mm) 5277 5080
Width (mm) 2163 1695
Height (mm) 1821 2285
Wheelbase (mm) 3220 2940
Fuel Tank (L) 80 65
Construction Body on Frame
Exterior Colors Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black
Curb Weight (kg) 2076
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone with Coil Spring Torsion Beam
Rear Suspension Leaf Spring Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 18 15 steel
Rear Wheels 18 15 steel
Front Tires 265/60 R18 195/70/R15
Rear Tires 265/60 R18 195/70/R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type EPS Hydraulic
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Steering Column Tilt
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes No
Parking Sensors Yes No
Stability Control Yes No
Traction Control Yes No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes No
Hill Descent Control Yes No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag Yes No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Side Airbags Yes No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Dual-zone EATC Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Standard Key
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights Yes No
Power Windows Yes No
Power Seats Yes No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 2
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights HID Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018): which should you buy?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (₱1,280,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers. Its lower price of ₱48,000 makes it more accessible, and it offers significantly higher torque (356 Nm vs 385 Nm) and power (129 PS vs 160 PS) for the same 6-speed manual transmission. While the Ford Ranger Wildtrak (₱1,328,000) has a slightly longer warranty (100,000km/3 years vs 3 years/100,000km) and a longer wheelbase (5277 mm vs 4878 mm), the NV350’s superior performance and simpler drivetrain make it the clearer daily driver. For heavy-duty work, the Ranger’s greater torque and 2017 model year might justify the cost, but the NV350’s lower price and 5-speed setup are ideal for most use cases.