Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019) Suzuki ₱1,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2019 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 102 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 3650 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1645 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1725 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2250 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 40 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Jungle Green, Medium Gray, Superior White, Kinetic Yellow + Bluish Black Pearl, Brisk Blue Metallic + Bluish Black Pearl, and Chiffon Ivory Metallic + Bluish Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | 3-Link Rigid Axle, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | 3-Link Rigid Axle, Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/80/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/80/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019): which should you buy?
The 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT and the 2019 Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on intended use. The Ranger, priced at ₱1,328,000, offers a turbo‑charged 2.2‑liter diesel engine delivering 160 PS and a hefty 385 Nm of torque, making it far more powerful for hauling loads or tackling steep grades. Its 6‑speed manual, rear‑wheel drive layout, larger dimensions (5277 mm L × 2163 mm W) and 2+3 seating give it true pick‑up utility and cargo space, ideal for small business owners, farmers, or families needing a workhorse. The Jimny, at ₱1,258,000, is lighter, with a 1.5‑liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine that produces 102 PS and 130 Nm, paired to a 5‑speed manual and 4WD system. Its compact 3‑door body‑on‑frame SUV design excels in urban maneuverability and off‑road fun, but it only seats four and lacks the cargo capacity of a pick‑up. Both carry a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Ranger’s higher power and payload outweigh its higher price for buyers needing work‑related capability. Conversely, city drivers who value a smaller footprint, lower running costs and 4WD for occasional trail use will find the Jimny more practical and slightly cheaper. Choose the Ranger for work and heavy‑duty tasks; choose the Jimny for everyday city driving with occasional off‑road adventures.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T is priced at ₱1,258,000, which is ₱70,000 less than the Ford Ranger Wildtrak’s ₱1,328,000 price.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak’s 2.2 L turbo diesel produces 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, far exceeding the Jimny’s 102 PS and 130 Nm.
Is the Jimny better for city driving?
Yes; the Jimny’s smaller size, 3‑door layout and compact dimensions make it easier to maneuver in tight urban streets compared to the larger Ranger pick‑up.
Can the Ranger be used for hauling cargo?
Yes; as a 4‑door pick‑up with a 2+3 seating arrangement and larger body dimensions, the Ranger is designed for cargo and payload tasks, unlike the Jimny which seats only four and lacks a dedicated cargo bed.